August 12, 2012

Must Watch Before You Die #31: The 'Three Colors' Trilogy (1993-94)


It was the summer of 1994. Kieslowski's 'Red' had had its premiere at Cannes. Its predecessors - 'Blue' and 'White' had premiered at Venice and Berlin less than ten months ago. Having won the Best Film and the Best Director for them respectively, and having nominated for Palm d'or at Cannes for his last film in the trilogy, Kieslowski was finally being hailed by the world. Many thought it was just the beginning. He thought otherwise. Soon after the premiere of 'Red', this Polish auteur announced his retirement from film making. He believed he had said all he had to. He was only 54.

In his final film, there is a character of an old judge, having opted for premature voluntary retirement. "I want nothing", he remarks, in one of the scenes. "Then stop breathing" - comes the reaction from the young female protagonist. Less than two years after Kieslowski announced his 'retirement', he died.

The discovery of Krzysztof Kieslowski as world cinema's big secret and one of the masters of the craft happened only after his retirement. Having worked all his life within the censorship and demoralizing political environment of USSR-influenced Poland, Kieslowski's early works were strongly political, and failed to reach to significant number of Western or Asian audience. Didn't this bother him when he was making some of the best films in contemporary European cinema? Did he really believe he was "so-so", as he says in the biographical documentary made on him? Didn't he enjoy the new-found adoration and acclaim that the world started to bestow upon him after the wave of liberation in eastern Europe in the early 90s? He was a film-maker who kept bettering himself all his life, saving the best for the end. His 'Decalog', and 'The Double Life of Veronique', along with the 'Three Colors Trilogy' are his best work. He was no Welles, or Godard, or Ray - to have impressed the world with his first film. Instead he remained a seeker all his life, constantly trying to master his storytelling and aesthetic skills.  How could he be satisfied making his final films primarily in a language he hardly understood (French) and on the national ideals of a country not his own (the three colors of the French flag)? Didn't he know that he had achieved a status where he could have made any film he wanted, and even attract some American funding and distribution in future? How could he, after struggling all his life to make the films he wanted to make, decide to give up when he had finally started to get all he deserved? Or more importantly, what was it in his final films that made him believe that he had accomplished all he wanted to? Today his works are savored by hard-core film-buffs all around the world. The vast majority of the film-watching population was, and remains, oblivious to the giant of an artist he was. And all those who watch his films are left wanting for more. Why did he have to go away so soon? Why did he decide to stop creating magic, when he could have gone ahead and conquered the world?

As I revisited the 'Three Colors Trilogy' over the past week, I was haunted by the same questions. A friend answered them for me. She has just discovered Kieslowski and has only watched the Trilogy. When I told her that Kieslowski's cinema constantly has a touch of pessimism, and a dark world-view, she made me realize that his final film was not so. 'Red' has so much of optimism and tenderness that it inspires you, unlike other films by him. Despite dealing with death and separation, 'Red' is a film about the power of goodness. I also find the themes of reincarnation and redemption all over it. But most importantly, it is a film about brotherhood, togetherness, about the bonds we share, about the great karmic connection that links all our souls. In Kieslowski's own words: "...If there is anything worthwhile doing for the sake of culture, then it is touching on subject matters and situations which link people, and not those that divide people... It doesn't matter who you are or who I am, if your tooth aches or mine, it's still the same pain... We all fear the same way and the same things. And we all love in the same way. That's why I tell about these things, because in all other things I immediately find division."

Perhaps we can understand Kieslowski's choice by understanding his cinema. Perhaps his entire filmography was a personal quest for faith and hope. And after having achieved that so stunningly in the finale of his final film - where the last incident connects all the characters of the trilogy together with a bond they are unaware of, perhaps the Master reached the spiritual zenith of his life as an artist. Soon, he did stop breathing, leaving behind a legacy the world was to cherish forever.

Today I proudly recommend my favorite film-maker's most popular works - the 'Three Colors Trilogy' as must-watch-before-you-die films. The first in the series - 'Blue' is my favorite film of all time. More about it later....

August 02, 2012

Kane Dethroned!


It’s a favorite pass-time for movie-buffs to create lists of ‘Greatest Films of All Time’. Several such lists are prepared and discussed and debated over every now and then. However, if there is one list that receives the maximum attention from serious cinephiles, and which is considered arguably the most important, it is the Sight and Sound poll that takes place once every decade. Ever since 1952, this magazine has been asking international film professionals to vote for the greatest film of all time. It is this poll that has been the most important instrument in creating the stature of ‘Citizen Kane’, which has widely been considered as the greatest film ever made. Since 1962, this Orson Welles masterpiece has topped the list every time, making its ‘greatest’ tag almost official.

Well, no more. The latest poll has come as a huge surprise for film-fanatics because the impossible has happened. ‘Citizen Kane’ has lost its throne to Alfred Hitchcock’s ‘Vertigo’ by a huge margin (191 versus 157 votes). The rise and rise of ‘Vertigo’ is another phenomenon. It made it into the Top 10 only 24 years after its release, when it was ranked 7th in the 1982 poll. It rose up to the 2nd position in the last poll, that is, in 2002. I was eagerly awaiting the results this year as it was the first Sight and Sound poll for me ever since I discovered International Cinema in 2006. And I was almost certain that ‘Kane’ will hold its position, not only because of its unanimous acclaim, but also because last year I had spent a lot of time studying this great film, and was convinced of its greatness. However, I have a soft spot for ‘Vertigo’ and Alfred Hitchcock and hence my feelings are mixed – I’m glad and sad at the same time. But more than anything, I’m surprised. The news is yet to sink in. And I confess that the wait for 2022 poll has begun!

Following are the movies that ever found a place in Top 10 ever since the first poll in 1952. Here are some of my observations:
-          ‘The Rules of the Game’ is the only film to have found a place in the Top 10 in all seven polls until today.
-          ‘Battleship Potemkin’ has failed to make it to the Top 10 for the first time in history.
-          ‘The Godfather – II’ is the latest film to have ever made it to the Top 10. All others are older than that.
-          It feels good to find an Indian film amidst all these, though ‘Pather Panchali’ could never make it to the Top 10 before or after 1992.
-          Both ‘Citizen Kane’ and ‘Vertigo’ are tragedies – timeless stories of obsessed men and their devastation. For the first time, I am drawing parallels between John ‘Scottie’ Fergusson and Charles Foster Kane. And I’m sorry for both.

Movie
2012
2002
1992
1982
1972
1962
1952
1
2
4
7
-
-
NA
2
1
1
1
1
1
-
Tokyo Story (1953)
3
5
3
-
-
-
NA
The Rules of the Game (1939)
4
3
2
2
2
3
10
Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927)
5
7
-
-
-
-
-
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
6
6
10
-
-
NA
NA
The Searchers (1956)
7
-
5
10
-
-
NA
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928)
9
-
6
-
7
-
7
10
9
-
5
4
NA
NA
Battleship Potemkin (1925)
-
7
6
6
3
6
4
L’avventura (1960)
-
-
-
7
5
2
NA
-
-
-
-
-
7
1
Greed (1924)
-
-
-
-
-
4
7
Ugetsu Monogatari (1953)
-
-
-
-
10
4
NA
Singin’ in the Rain (1952)
-
10
-
4
-
-
NA
The Gold Rush (1925)
-
-
-
-
12
-
2
The Magnificent Ambersons (1942)
-
-
-
7
8
-
-
L’Atalante (1934)
-
-
6
-
-
10
-
The General (1926)
-
-
-
10
8
-
-
Ivan the Terrible (1944)
-
-
-
-
12
7
-
City Lights (1931)
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
3
-
-
NA
The Godfather – 1 and 2 (1972-74)
-
4
-
-
NA
NA
NA
Persona (1966)
-
-
-
-
5
NA
NA
Intolerance (1916)
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
Louisiana Story (1948)
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
Pather Panchali (1955)
-
-
6
-
-
-
NA
Le Jour se leve (1939)
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
La terra trema (1947)
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
Wild Strawberries (1957)
-
-
-
-
10
-
NA
Brief Encounter (1945)
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
Le Million (1931)
-
-
-
-
-
-
10


P.S. “NA” means “not-applicable” as the poll in question was conducted before the release of the respective film. “ – “ means the film has failed to acquire a place into the Top 10.

Click here to see the list of Top 50. Wong Kar Wai's 'In the Mood for Love' and David Lynch's 'Mulholland Dr.' are the only films from the new millennium to feature in the list.